<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Company You Keep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/</link>
	<description>Peace, Prosperity, and Liberty</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Not an appalling paulian Says</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2367</link>
		<dc:creator>Not an appalling paulian Says</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2367</guid>
		<description>Jeremy: about the vast conspiracy pinning Lawson with Paul -- you gotta be kidding me with the victim card -- The only picture missing at this website is the photo of the umbilical card between Lawson and Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy: about the vast conspiracy pinning Lawson with Paul &#8212; you gotta be kidding me with the victim card &#8212; The only picture missing at this website is the photo of the umbilical card between Lawson and Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not an appalling paulian Says</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2366</link>
		<dc:creator>Not an appalling paulian Says</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2366</guid>
		<description>I'm not at all surprised that a few of you are unable to follow my point. That is consistent with denial. Yea, sure. Ron Paul really is all that and a cup of coffee. That's why he commanded 4%, to Huckabee's 9% in the NC primary. That's gotta bolster your enthusiasm. That Lawson trounced Cho (for which I gave kudos) will be meaningless in the general election. But hey, enjoy your r&lt;b&gt;EVOL&lt;/b&gt;ution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not at all surprised that a few of you are unable to follow my point. That is consistent with denial. Yea, sure. Ron Paul really is all that and a cup of coffee. That&#8217;s why he commanded 4%, to Huckabee&#8217;s 9% in the NC primary. That&#8217;s gotta bolster your enthusiasm. That Lawson trounced Cho (for which I gave kudos) will be meaningless in the general election. But hey, enjoy your r<b>EVOL</b>ution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2222</guid>
		<description>Well actually, the thing I don't understand is his problem with Paul.  It's bad that his supporters show the word "love" backwards in the word "revolution"???  What?!? This makes no sense, you don't even say anything about the issues?  Some candidates are going crazy over calling themselves "Ron Paul Republicans".  The conservatives go "I'm a true Goldwater, Reagan, Paul Republican," vote for me.  You should see some of the races on VA... they're trying to put Paul's name into everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well actually, the thing I don&#8217;t understand is his problem with Paul.  It&#8217;s bad that his supporters show the word &#8220;love&#8221; backwards in the word &#8220;revolution&#8221;???  What?!? This makes no sense, you don&#8217;t even say anything about the issues?  Some candidates are going crazy over calling themselves &#8220;Ron Paul Republicans&#8221;.  The conservatives go &#8220;I&#8217;m a true Goldwater, Reagan, Paul Republican,&#8221; vote for me.  You should see some of the races on VA&#8230; they&#8217;re trying to put Paul&#8217;s name into everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin B. Clark</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin B. Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>NAAP:

What are you talking about?  You think that BJ is going to be an easy target against Price?  What about Cho?  If you seriously believe that Augustus Cho stands a better chance than BJ Lawson of beating David Price then you are seriously delusional.

BJ beat Cho by 14, 310 votes.  A resounding victory, in the face of negative campaigning by the party establishment and by people who want to throw around Ron Paul's name as if it was a dirty word, or a kiss of death on a republican campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NAAP:</p>
<p>What are you talking about?  You think that BJ is going to be an easy target against Price?  What about Cho?  If you seriously believe that Augustus Cho stands a better chance than BJ Lawson of beating David Price then you are seriously delusional.</p>
<p>BJ beat Cho by 14, 310 votes.  A resounding victory, in the face of negative campaigning by the party establishment and by people who want to throw around Ron Paul&#8217;s name as if it was a dirty word, or a kiss of death on a republican campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2216</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2216</guid>
		<description>Does anyone understand what the person above this post is talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone understand what the person above this post is talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not an appalling paulian</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2199</link>
		<dc:creator>Not an appalling paulian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2199</guid>
		<description>Well, you beat Cho, and clearly so, congratulations. I frankly didn't care for Cho either; but...

Justin; do you not see the baggage RP brings to any dance? BTW; RP was beat by a guy that has already withdrawn and now supports I forget whom; no blimps or silly rEVOLution (that's 'love,' backwards, like ELO albums from the 70's) phrases really mattered at the polls. It all reminds me of LaRouche, not in policy -- which I can't stand, but in baggage. Is that really that image you want to strike up? That Mr. Lawson doesn't get this baggage is a major concern. That will make Mr. Lawson an easy mark for a seasoned vet like Price. Yet again.

Now then, you want to ask tough questions for a better answer. Any non-Dem can do that; frankly, that was an uninspiring story, with due respect to the patient.

Of course I'll support Lawson with my vote this fall. I can not stand Price's politics, but idealogical zealotry only animates the fringe. The sky's been falling, whether left or right, since I was a kid. Good luck with that message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you beat Cho, and clearly so, congratulations. I frankly didn&#8217;t care for Cho either; but&#8230;</p>
<p>Justin; do you not see the baggage RP brings to any dance? BTW; RP was beat by a guy that has already withdrawn and now supports I forget whom; no blimps or silly rEVOLution (that&#8217;s &#8216;love,&#8217; backwards, like ELO albums from the 70&#8217;s) phrases really mattered at the polls. It all reminds me of LaRouche, not in policy &#8212; which I can&#8217;t stand, but in baggage. Is that really that image you want to strike up? That Mr. Lawson doesn&#8217;t get this baggage is a major concern. That will make Mr. Lawson an easy mark for a seasoned vet like Price. Yet again.</p>
<p>Now then, you want to ask tough questions for a better answer. Any non-Dem can do that; frankly, that was an uninspiring story, with due respect to the patient.</p>
<p>Of course I&#8217;ll support Lawson with my vote this fall. I can not stand Price&#8217;s politics, but idealogical zealotry only animates the fringe. The sky&#8217;s been falling, whether left or right, since I was a kid. Good luck with that message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin B. Clark</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2113</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin B. Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2113</guid>
		<description>NAAP: 

Please trust me when I tell that you that whatever problem you have with Ron Paul, the idea of seeing Augustus Cho as the parties nominee is ridiculous enough to ask you to put them aside.

I encourage you to read the blog post that BJ linked above...its great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NAAP: </p>
<p>Please trust me when I tell that you that whatever problem you have with Ron Paul, the idea of seeing Augustus Cho as the parties nominee is ridiculous enough to ask you to put them aside.</p>
<p>I encourage you to read the blog post that BJ linked above&#8230;its great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Lawson</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>NAAP - Keep reading, my friend. You do not yet understand what is at stake:

http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/13/why-im-running-for-congress/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NAAP - Keep reading, my friend. You do not yet understand what is at stake:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/13/why-im-running-for-congress/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/13/why-im-running-for-congress/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not an appalling paulian</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2109</link>
		<dc:creator>Not an appalling paulian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2109</guid>
		<description>Oh am I disappointed. I was ready to vote for Lawon until I saw him shake R.P.'s hand. The only thing worse that Ron Paul is the torrent of crazy Paulian responses -- suffice it to say that with nose clipped, I shall vote for Cho. I'm afraid D Price will take it again. Bummer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh am I disappointed. I was ready to vote for Lawon until I saw him shake R.P.&#8217;s hand. The only thing worse that Ron Paul is the torrent of crazy Paulian responses &#8212; suffice it to say that with nose clipped, I shall vote for Cho. I&#8217;m afraid D Price will take it again. Bummer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2021</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawsonforcongress.com/2008/04/28/the-company-you-keep/#comment-2021</guid>
		<description>Bill, neither William Lawson or Ron Paul are a part of the Libertarian Party.  They are Republicans.  Also, the Libertarian Party is somewhat of a branch of the Republican Party anyway.  You are also incorrect in saying that libertarianism is not conservatism.  Fred Hutchison describes it as another part of conservatism that originated in the 20th century.  Also, as you know, Reagan has said that the root of conservatism is libertarianism.  This is why Mr. Cho has contradicted himself.  Finally, Ron Paul is considered one of the most conservative members of congress, the "taxpayers best friend," and one of Reagan's first supporters.  Ronald Reagan also endorsed Ron Paul when he ran for congress.  While you say you voted for President Reagan, you should know that Ron Paul was a leader in this movement.


Seeing as you are focused on Dr. Ron Paul, perhaps you should see this as well: http://www.militaryforpaul.com/reagan.html

This explains some of the things I have mentioned and it shows some pictures of Congressman Paul and President Reagan together.  So you see, it is very strange to say that Ron Paul (or someone with Ron Paul's ideals) is not a Reagan Republican.  These two men worked together to bring conservative values to government and they were also friends.  You may have also heard of Barry Goldwater or "Mr. Conservative."  His son, Barry Goldwater Jr, who was a congressman, has also endorsed Paul for the presidency.  Ron Paul and B.J. Lawson are very-much-so Reagan and Goldwater Republicans.

Mr. Cho on the other hand, supports big government things such as the REAL ID ACT.  This act is opposed by every conservative I can think of.  Mr. Cho also has no foundation of fiscal conservatism.  It's more than just saying no to more taxes.  By the way, perhaps if Mr. Cho had responded to my email it would have cleared up the confusion.  However, I have a feeling that this isn't confusion... Augustus Cho just doesn't have conservative values.  If you disagree, please ask Augustus Cho to respond to the email that I sent on April 15th.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, neither William Lawson or Ron Paul are a part of the Libertarian Party.  They are Republicans.  Also, the Libertarian Party is somewhat of a branch of the Republican Party anyway.  You are also incorrect in saying that libertarianism is not conservatism.  Fred Hutchison describes it as another part of conservatism that originated in the 20th century.  Also, as you know, Reagan has said that the root of conservatism is libertarianism.  This is why Mr. Cho has contradicted himself.  Finally, Ron Paul is considered one of the most conservative members of congress, the &#8220;taxpayers best friend,&#8221; and one of Reagan&#8217;s first supporters.  Ronald Reagan also endorsed Ron Paul when he ran for congress.  While you say you voted for President Reagan, you should know that Ron Paul was a leader in this movement.</p>
<p>Seeing as you are focused on Dr. Ron Paul, perhaps you should see this as well: <a href="http://www.militaryforpaul.com/reagan.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.militaryforpaul.com/reagan.html</a></p>
<p>This explains some of the things I have mentioned and it shows some pictures of Congressman Paul and President Reagan together.  So you see, it is very strange to say that Ron Paul (or someone with Ron Paul&#8217;s ideals) is not a Reagan Republican.  These two men worked together to bring conservative values to government and they were also friends.  You may have also heard of Barry Goldwater or &#8220;Mr. Conservative.&#8221;  His son, Barry Goldwater Jr, who was a congressman, has also endorsed Paul for the presidency.  Ron Paul and B.J. Lawson are very-much-so Reagan and Goldwater Republicans.</p>
<p>Mr. Cho on the other hand, supports big government things such as the REAL ID ACT.  This act is opposed by every conservative I can think of.  Mr. Cho also has no foundation of fiscal conservatism.  It&#8217;s more than just saying no to more taxes.  By the way, perhaps if Mr. Cho had responded to my email it would have cleared up the confusion.  However, I have a feeling that this isn&#8217;t confusion&#8230; Augustus Cho just doesn&#8217;t have conservative values.  If you disagree, please ask Augustus Cho to respond to the email that I sent on April 15th.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
