Legislative Attention Deficit Disorder
By: BJ Lawson
You must be kidding me.
I first started studying how Washington works when I was in medical training, back when HIPAA was being born. Remember HIPAA? The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act? As I watched Congress empower unelected bureaucrats and lobbyists to share my protected health information with anyone having a financial interest in my care, “You must be kidding me” became a regular refrain.
But then I discovered a much more serious medical problem in Washington. Despite the fact that Congress loves providing drugs for our senior citizens, even at risk of national bankruptcy, they have thus far failed to diagnose or treat their own illness: Legislative Attention Deficit Disorder, or LADD.
The most common symptom of LADD is failure to focus on a single topic when creating legislation. Instead, legislators become excited when reading legislation that is likely to pass. As a result of this excitement, their minds begin wandering to the grab bag of promises they have made to special interests. In the final stages, this inability to concentrate on the legislation’s original topic culminates in spasmodic and capricious additions and amendments that are completely unrelated, dangerous, and costly.
Today’s example is typical: Senator Dianne Feinstein added an amnesty provision for up to 1.35 million illegal agricultural workers to an Iraq supplemental appropriations bill:
At today’s markup of the Iraq supplemental appropriations bill, the Senate Appropriations Committee committed an outrageous act of disrespect for our men and women in uniform and to the citizens of this country by adopting an amendment by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) that gives amnesty to illegal-alien agricultural workers. The copy of the amendment obtained by NumbersUSA indicates a maximum of 1.35 million illegal aliens, plus their families, could obtain “emergency agricultural worker status” for a five-year period. However, the amendment also provides for an adjustment of status, which paves the way for permanent legalization.
You must be kidding me.
Folks, this is just plain bad government. Unfortunately, it’s up to you to fight back. Regardless of your stance on the Iraq war or immigration, is it appropriate for legislators to hijack legislation in this fashion? Shouldn’t we insist that our legislators embrace common sense, and limit legislation to one subject at a time so votes can accurately reflect the opinions of our elected representatives?
Please, help restore common sense to Washington. I have three requests:
- Visit NumbersUSA to learn more about this affront to good government, and how to contact your Senators today to fight this back-door attempt at amnesty for illegal immigrants. As NumbersUSA notes, there is no need for amnesty for agricultural workers — there already is an H-2A foreign agricultural worker program that provides growers with unlimited temporary workers.
- To address the broader problem of LADD, learn about the One Subject at a Time Act, which requires Congress to limit legislation to a single subject. I support the One Subject at a Time Act, along with the Enumerated Powers Act, Read the Bills Act, and Write the Laws Act, as nonpartisan “good government” reforms that would drastically improve our legislative honesty and effectiveness.
- Donate today to our Congressional campaign. In the week since the primary, I have been focused almost entirely on fundraising. We are preparing a large, targeted mailing and need your immediate help today!
May 16th, 2008 at 12:17 am
BTW, you might want to take Feinstein to task for her hypocrisy on the gun control issue. No guns for the peasants to protect themselves, but she employs armed guards for her own protection.
-jcr
***
Ed: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1994049/posts

May 16th, 2008 at 12:37 am
John - Good point. Unfortunately, we don’t even have to go to California to find folks who have trouble understanding the Second Amendment. Rep. Price and his wife are both well-known opponents of self-defense. Here’s a well-written letter to the editor in the Chapel Hill News from 1994:
http://www.jtk3.com/laissezfirearm/dontblam.htm
Wow… what a bit of history. Wait a minute, Price is still in Congress, and it’s 2008. Does that seem like a long time to anyone? Anyone think it’s time for change?
May 16th, 2008 at 2:57 pm
Too many lobbyist benefit from the LADD going on in DC. It is no wonder that the drug companies have not come up with a medicinal treatment!
May 16th, 2008 at 3:35 pm
Mmm. I think the American people are sick and tired of paying for the PRICE of PRICE and other equally confused politicians.
May 16th, 2008 at 10:36 pm
Am I crazy or is that senator crazy? What does amnesty have to do with Iraq. I have a question how come things that are totally from another planet land on bills that are not related? Isnt that unethical? I, disgusted by politics
May 16th, 2008 at 10:51 pm
I would like to note than Ms Feinstein claims to be in opposition to this illegal war. Yet she voted for the war and supported it. She has a 100.00% rating by most pro-Abortion Anti-Life groups. She votes for deficit spending and pork barrel projects like a drunken sailor. Very anti-Constitution record.
She has a rating of 0.00% by the Conservative index of the JBS
She also has a 0.00% rating by the Club for Growth
How do those people keep on getting re-elected
May 17th, 2008 at 8:36 am
Conservative Kid:
That question is one that we need to be asking in this campaign! David Price’s record is nomore constitutional than Senator Feinstein. BJ offers a stark contrast to David Price, and once we get the message out I am confident that the voters of the 4th district will respond.
May 19th, 2008 at 11:56 pm
Guess what Dr. Lawson?
Senator Feinstein is #4 in Judicial Watch’s top 10 most corrupt politicians in Washington for 2007
http://www.judicialwatch.org/
heres a quote
4. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA): As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee’s subcommittee on military construction, Feinstein reviewed military construction government contracts, some of which were ultimately awarded to URS Corporation and Perini, companies then owned by Feinstein’s husband, Richard Blum. While the Pentagon ultimately awards military contracts, there is a reason for the review process. The Senate’s subcommittee on Military Construction’s approval carries weight. Sen. Feinstein, therefore, likely had influence over the decision making process. Senator Feinstein also attempted to undermine ethics reform in 2007, arguing in favor of a perk that allows members of Congress to book multiple airline flights and then cancel them without financial penalty. Judicial Watch’s investigation into this matter is ongoing.
the list also includes Hillary Rodham Clinton as #1 , fmr Mayor Rudy Giulliani as #5, Fmr Gov. Mike Huckabee as #6, Speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi as #9, and Senator Barack Hussein Obama as #8, also Senator Larry Craig as #3 on the list lolol. God save us all